This year+ experience in Brazil has been extremely rewarding
and important for me to revise and rethink previous notions I had regarding
Brazilian academia and how to transit within it. Not only did I lack a
theoretical foundation (which I will continue to build at the University of
Michgan) but also practical experience as a “gringa” within this field. I had
considered the power dynamics between myself as a researcher and my subjects,
but not necessarily between my academic colleagues.
Throughout my classes at CEAO and research I have become a
bit baffled by the concept of Feminist Anthropology, especially in Brazil. It
appears to me that nobody knows exactly what it means, yet many are chasing after
it, trying to find some sort of militant discussion of gender, of women, of
sexuality in order to get past common sense notions of separation and
difference between the “sexes”. Yet in this field I’ve encountered politics
typical of any site of power and competition for career success that do not
necessarily value the production of knowledge or consensus as linked to any
sort of social movement/basis.
My relationship with fellow students however has been
generally positive. I found it was easiest to connect with people from my own
positioning (despite my foreign nationality), my own generation and I feel we
have a common interest in treating each other with kindness and respect, to
help one another in producing the best work possible. I am optimistic in this
respect, and have faith in the possibilities for change as we grow and seek
common goals to direct academia towards living subjects and think about the
consequences of representation within an educated and diverse society.
As for my ethnography, I am still in the process of
preparation. My M.A. project will stick closer to historical research utilizing
letters and photos that explain Landes’ fieldwork experience in Brazil, and
then place her legacy within the context of Brazilian anthropology. I believe
this to be a feasible task, and will expand the project further as I develop my
Ph.D. research, which as of now will probably include ethnography of gender and
sexuality in Afro-American religions such as candomblé.
I’ve created significant relationships within the candomblé
community, not as strictly informants, but academic students themselves,
friends of friends, and new acquaintances. However, the religion itself presents many
difficulties as a field of study. I believe it to be extremely important to
understand the history of academia within terreiros and how they have
negotiated relationships with the public over the past century. Not only are
these power dynamics important to consider, but the actual functioning of the
spiritual forces within candomblé present different obstacles and
considerations. It’s absolutely necessary to understand how the people in the
religion interpret your presence and your possible place within their cosmology
as a foreigner, as a researcher. This exercise is much more delicate and at
times abstract, requiring sensitivity and time to consider various perspectives
in relation to your specific research objectives. Having the luxury of time
(about 15 months) has allowed me to dive into these methodological questions with
the intention of creating and executing a worthwhile project in the near future.
As of now, I’m off to begin my Ph.D. at the University of
Michigan in a joint History and Anthropology program with advisor Paul C.
Johnson. I’ll return to Bahia from May – August 2014 to finish up my M.A.
research and plan on continuing with this blog whenever relevant.
Oh, I’ve also been published in Portuguese, if you’re
interested take a look http://www.prp.ueg.br/revista/index.php/revistahistoria/article/view/1585 . It’s a translated and revised version of my
undergraduate History thesis regarding the relationship between Edison Carneiro
and Ruth Landes.
Thank you to my readers, and please keep in touch!
Grande abraço,
ajamie@umich.edu
No comments:
Post a Comment